What does the future hold for e-mail?
As of this writing, Google hasn’t formally announced its plans for integrating some form of social-status updates into Gmail. I’m not going to speculate about what they’re planning — though I encourage you to give it a shot — and to read Augie Ray’s provocative take on the subject.
Instead, I wanted to open up the floor to thoughts on the future of e-mail.
Modern social platforms combine the features of three grandfather platforms: e-mail, instant messaging and message boards. Message boards are almost exclusively public and instant messages are usually private — now that chat rooms are an endangered species. E-mail combines the public and the private in a way that’s so elegant we rarely stop to think about it. You can easily flip back and forth between responding to one, some or all recipients — or even forward it to an unrelated party.
The underlying weakness of every single social network on the Web today is that none of them has managed to emulate the versatility and simplicity that every e-mail service has by default. Of course, e-mail has a huge weakness, too — you can’t use it to speak publicly or contact a person unless you know their address. That weakness is a part of why pundits love pronouncing it dead — something that understandably makes me nervous. But I don’t think it’s dying — I think it’s due for an evolution.
Google tried something really brave and interesting with Google Wave: a product that moves between groups of users and individuals in a fluid way. I’m not prepared to call it a failure at this stage — after all, most people don’t even have the ability to sign up for an account, but I can say that it hasn’t clicked for me yet. It’s not as intuitive as Google seems to think it is, and it doesn’t have potential as a broadcast tool.
Let me tell you my dream. My dream is that Google will take what it learned from Google Wave and use it to make e-mail a really fluid social platform. I want to be able to send a message to small groups about something I’m considering, then easily switch to chat with group members in real time about their input. Then, when I feel the message is ready, I’ll be able to broadcast it across all my networks.
I don’t want to ever have to think about platforms again — only intended recipients. Sure, there are fragments of this now — blog posting via e-mail, Facebook posting via Twitter, etc. But they aren’t integrated and they aren’t elegant.
Whatever Google announces, I know it won’t be that simple. But I hope that someday it can be.
What are you expecting from Google’s announcement? What does your ideal social platform look like?
Image credit, Pablo631, via iStock
Related posts:




Posted by uberVU - social comments on February 9th, 2010 at 4:00 pm
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by dialogue1_de: What does the future hold for e-mail? http://bit.ly/aIYDfv...
Posted by Katie Howison on February 9th, 2010 at 6:05 pm
People once said TV was dead too. It just got better. Same thing with radio. Email is still the easiest way to communicate; you just need a computer and access. Plus, maybe you don't want to go public with some of your messages. That said, we will continue to see a growing use of other interactive tools as they become more user-friendly, and as the best tools rise to the top, eliminating some of the confusing clutter that has so many people reaching for Tylenol. Let me say one thing here, I really dislike the gmail set-up. It's confusing when compared to Outlook; harder to track what's really inbox versus “sent” — plus a few other pet peeves. So I only use it for newsletters, Alerts, guest blogs, etc. Google could do well by improving their email set-up too.
Posted by Kat on February 9th, 2010 at 6:07 pm
I'd love to see an intergration with FB & email. It would be so convienant to be able to have all of my online communications in one place.
Posted by stefanlubinski on February 9th, 2010 at 6:32 pm
Well written, well thought out. I don't believe the Wave will ever take off. As you pointed out, it is far from intuitive. Moreover without critical mass from your contacts, it is like a tree falling with no one to hear it.
Posted by SF on February 9th, 2010 at 7:12 pm
The smart email vendors out there will do just fine if they are open to amending their expertise to include mobile marketing etc.
More importantly, I think that email experts will have the inside track in online marketing to customers who use larger devices like the iPad. It's inevitable that these devices will become more commonplace, and email marketers will be better positioned to take advantage of their capabilites than current mobile messaging experts.
Posted by kimlovo on February 9th, 2010 at 11:51 pm
My problem with every new tool releases is that they all are so ugly and without design. Sure, it worked for the searchengine, but how the heck do you use Gmail in a proper way without getting nervous about the total chaos in design and user friendly issues?
Posted by Links: Zukunft der E-Mail, Awards Gallery, Google Buzz - Email Marketing Blog on February 10th, 2010 at 4:39 am
[...] What does the future hold for e-mail? Jesse Stanchak hat sich Gedanken zur Zukunft der E-Mail gemacht: “The underlying weakness of every single social network on the Web today is that none of them has managed to emulate the versatility and simplicity that every e-mail service has by default.” [...]
Posted by Will Google Buzz change the face of social engagement? | SmartBlog On Social Media on February 10th, 2010 at 9:54 am
[...] I wrote about my dream of a unified social platform that’s as versatile and intuitive as e-mail. Google Buzz [...]
Posted by What does the future hold for e-mail? | SmartBlog On Social Media « Digital Naiv – Stefan63's Blog on May 28th, 2010 at 1:10 am
[...] 11 Feb Let me tell you my dream. My dream is that Google will take what it learned from Google Wave and use it to make e-mail a really fluid social platform. I want to be able to send a message to small groups about something I’m considering, then easily switch to chat with group members in real time about their input. Then, when I feel the message is ready, I’ll be able to broadcast it across all my networks. via smartblogs.com [...]