<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why we tweet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/2009/05/27/why-we-tweet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/2009/05/27/why-we-tweet/</link>
	<description>SmartBlog on Social Media is a blog providing insights on successful social media marketing for businesses.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:08:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Trackbacks for SmartBlog On Social Media » Why we tweet [smartblogs.com] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/2009/05/27/why-we-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-13484</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for SmartBlog On Social Media » Why we tweet [smartblogs.com] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/?p=3436#comment-13484</guid>
		<description>[...] SmartBlog On Social Media » Why we tweet  smartblogs.com/socialmedia/2009/05/27/why-we-tweet &#8211; view page &#8211; cached  SmartPulse — our weekly reader poll in Smartbrief on Social Media — tracks feedback from leading marketers about social media practices and issues. &#8212; From the page [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SmartBlog On Social Media » Why we tweet  smartblogs.com/socialmedia/2009/05/27/why-we-tweet &ndash; view page &ndash; cached  SmartPulse — our weekly reader poll in Smartbrief on Social Media — tracks feedback from leading marketers about social media practices and issues. &mdash; From the page [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links of Note, May 2009: Social Media 100 &#171; Peg Mulligan&#39;s Blog: Technical and Marketing Communication</title>
		<link>http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/2009/05/27/why-we-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-7975</link>
		<dc:creator>Links of Note, May 2009: Social Media 100 &#171; Peg Mulligan&#39;s Blog: Technical and Marketing Communication</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/?p=3436#comment-7975</guid>
		<description>[...] Why we tweet: Paul Chaney, Internet marketing director for Bizzuka and member of the SmartBrief on Social Media Advisory Board, reports the results of a recent poll, which indicates &#8220;Twitter [may] tend to appeal to news junkies.&#8221; Other notable results from the &#8220;Why we tweet&#8221; poll include &#8220;the extremely low percentage of people/companies using it for customer service&#8221; and &#8220;the markedly high percentage of those that use it for staying on top of news and trends.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why we tweet: Paul Chaney, Internet marketing director for Bizzuka and member of the SmartBrief on Social Media Advisory Board, reports the results of a recent poll, which indicates &#8220;Twitter [may] tend to appeal to news junkies.&#8221; Other notable results from the &#8220;Why we tweet&#8221; poll include &#8220;the extremely low percentage of people/companies using it for customer service&#8221; and &#8220;the markedly high percentage of those that use it for staying on top of news and trends.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Ellen Slayter</title>
		<link>http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/2009/05/27/why-we-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-7743</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Ellen Slayter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 19:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/?p=3436#comment-7743</guid>
		<description>@Daniela There were 184 responses, or about 1 percent of the subs for the brief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniela There were 184 responses, or about 1 percent of the subs for the brief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniela</title>
		<link>http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/2009/05/27/why-we-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-7738</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/?p=3436#comment-7738</guid>
		<description>Just curious as to the sample size and number of responses out of that sample size?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious as to the sample size and number of responses out of that sample size?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

