<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlogWell preview: A conversation with Tyson&#8217;s Ed Nicholson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/2009/04/22/blogwell-preview-a-conversation-with-tysons-ed-nicholson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/2009/04/22/blogwell-preview-a-conversation-with-tysons-ed-nicholson/</link>
	<description>SmartBlog on Social Media is a blog providing insights on successful social media marketing for businesses.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Nicholson</title>
		<link>http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/2009/04/22/blogwell-preview-a-conversation-with-tysons-ed-nicholson/comment-page-1/#comment-6033</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Nicholson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/?p=2761#comment-6033</guid>
		<description>Michael, I believe your comments are spot-on correct.  Just to be clear, I should first point out that the skepticism for Tyson&#039;s involvement to which I referred was far outweighed by the support we received.  So that factor most certainly should not be something that gives brands pause to get involved.
Additionally, I think it is absolutely imperative for companies to show ROI for their philantrhopic activities if they&#039;re to be sustainable.  Tyson Foods is a publicly-traded company, and my group goes to our shareholders to seek resources to make our programs possible.  The need to show ROI becomes even more critical when red ink flows--as it has with our company recently.  It&#039;s easy to &quot;give back&quot; when there are profits.  But it helps to  have a business case to keep things going when the bottom line turns negative. 
Finally, I would re-emphasize that, while there are certainly returns--to both brands and non-profits--in cause marketing campaigns, there are lasting benefits in finding a cause that fits the company&#039;s business activity, engaging people, and staying involved over the long term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, I believe your comments are spot-on correct.  Just to be clear, I should first point out that the skepticism for Tyson&#8217;s involvement to which I referred was far outweighed by the support we received.  So that factor most certainly should not be something that gives brands pause to get involved.<br />
Additionally, I think it is absolutely imperative for companies to show ROI for their philantrhopic activities if they&#8217;re to be sustainable.  Tyson Foods is a publicly-traded company, and my group goes to our shareholders to seek resources to make our programs possible.  The need to show ROI becomes even more critical when red ink flows&#8211;as it has with our company recently.  It&#8217;s easy to &#8220;give back&#8221; when there are profits.  But it helps to  have a business case to keep things going when the bottom line turns negative.<br />
Finally, I would re-emphasize that, while there are certainly returns&#8211;to both brands and non-profits&#8211;in cause marketing campaigns, there are lasting benefits in finding a cause that fits the company&#8217;s business activity, engaging people, and staying involved over the long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Nicholson of Tyson Foods Talks Social Media Before BlogWell Conference &#171; Lance Turner</title>
		<link>http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/2009/04/22/blogwell-preview-a-conversation-with-tysons-ed-nicholson/comment-page-1/#comment-5986</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Nicholson of Tyson Foods Talks Social Media Before BlogWell Conference &#171; Lance Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/?p=2761#comment-5986</guid>
		<description>[...] this week, Nicholson spoke to SmartBlog about his social media efforts and shared some advice for other groups looking to dip a toe in the water to promote philanthropic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this week, Nicholson spoke to SmartBlog about his social media efforts and shared some advice for other groups looking to dip a toe in the water to promote philanthropic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Long</title>
		<link>http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/2009/04/22/blogwell-preview-a-conversation-with-tysons-ed-nicholson/comment-page-1/#comment-5966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/?p=2761#comment-5966</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really happy to read that Tyson Foods is involved with a project like this.  The impact that large corporations can have on non-profits is tremendous!  Well done!

It is, however, disturbing to hear about the push back you have received in the process of launching the program.  Specifically, you mentioned &quot;Externally, I think some people naturally suspect motives in corporate philanthropic involvement, and we did see a bit of that skepticism as we first started participating in online communities.&quot;

This perception issue is important for a couple of reasons.  First, if companies (large and small) avoid using this platform to help non-profits based on the potential for criticism, what we really lose is the assistance of numerous financially backed organizations.  Let&#039;s pretend, for a moment, that Tyson Foods participated in corporate philanthropy strictly with the goal to impact their bottom line.  Would that in some way forbid them from helping good causes... not at all.  Would they, in some way, have contributed less because they want their business to succeed?

I believe that we need to find a place, especially with the advent of social media, where it is acceptable for corporations to get involved without having to justify their intentions.  Their place is that they have capital and people... some of which have very large networks!  The smaller organizations have a place as well... perhaps it&#039;s more difficult with a lack of funds to spread a large scale message, but they should still get involved.

The bottom line is this.  Companies stay in business by providing a product and/or service that is in demand.  The higher the demand, the more money a company makes... assuming the wheels are spinning right.  Non-Profits stay in business through the support of both public and private entities, which arguably originate at the same source.  If people buy more products from a company based on their involvement... is that really a bad thing?  If you think so, would you be willing to eliminate corporate involvement knowing good and well that non-profit organizations around the world would suffer?  I hope not.

I say... be proud!  If you are a corporation sponsoring a cause, shout it to the world.  Get people involved!  Have fun!  Do something different.  Is the business getting more exposure... yes they are!  Is the non-profit getting more exposure... absolutely!  It can and should be a very transparent win-win for all parties involved.

Good luck with your project Tyson Foods!  Thanks for getting involved!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really happy to read that Tyson Foods is involved with a project like this.  The impact that large corporations can have on non-profits is tremendous!  Well done!</p>
<p>It is, however, disturbing to hear about the push back you have received in the process of launching the program.  Specifically, you mentioned &#8220;Externally, I think some people naturally suspect motives in corporate philanthropic involvement, and we did see a bit of that skepticism as we first started participating in online communities.&#8221;</p>
<p>This perception issue is important for a couple of reasons.  First, if companies (large and small) avoid using this platform to help non-profits based on the potential for criticism, what we really lose is the assistance of numerous financially backed organizations.  Let&#8217;s pretend, for a moment, that Tyson Foods participated in corporate philanthropy strictly with the goal to impact their bottom line.  Would that in some way forbid them from helping good causes&#8230; not at all.  Would they, in some way, have contributed less because they want their business to succeed?</p>
<p>I believe that we need to find a place, especially with the advent of social media, where it is acceptable for corporations to get involved without having to justify their intentions.  Their place is that they have capital and people&#8230; some of which have very large networks!  The smaller organizations have a place as well&#8230; perhaps it&#8217;s more difficult with a lack of funds to spread a large scale message, but they should still get involved.</p>
<p>The bottom line is this.  Companies stay in business by providing a product and/or service that is in demand.  The higher the demand, the more money a company makes&#8230; assuming the wheels are spinning right.  Non-Profits stay in business through the support of both public and private entities, which arguably originate at the same source.  If people buy more products from a company based on their involvement&#8230; is that really a bad thing?  If you think so, would you be willing to eliminate corporate involvement knowing good and well that non-profit organizations around the world would suffer?  I hope not.</p>
<p>I say&#8230; be proud!  If you are a corporation sponsoring a cause, shout it to the world.  Get people involved!  Have fun!  Do something different.  Is the business getting more exposure&#8230; yes they are!  Is the non-profit getting more exposure&#8230; absolutely!  It can and should be a very transparent win-win for all parties involved.</p>
<p>Good luck with your project Tyson Foods!  Thanks for getting involved!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmartBlog On Social Media » Blog Archive » Blogwell preview: A &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/2009/04/22/blogwell-preview-a-conversation-with-tysons-ed-nicholson/comment-page-1/#comment-5898</link>
		<dc:creator>SmartBlog On Social Media » Blog Archive » Blogwell preview: A &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/?p=2761#comment-5898</guid>
		<description>[...] post: SmartBlog On Social Media » Blog Archive » Blogwell preview: A &#8230;   Tags: both-large, china, conversations, market-entry, national, received-more, then-offered, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post: SmartBlog On Social Media » Blog Archive » Blogwell preview: A &#8230;   Tags: both-large, china, conversations, market-entry, national, received-more, then-offered, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topics about Communitys &#187; Archive &#187; Blogwell preview: A conversation with Tyson’s Ed Nicholson</title>
		<link>http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/2009/04/22/blogwell-preview-a-conversation-with-tysons-ed-nicholson/comment-page-1/#comment-5867</link>
		<dc:creator>Topics about Communitys &#187; Archive &#187; Blogwell preview: A conversation with Tyson’s Ed Nicholson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/?p=2761#comment-5867</guid>
		<description>[...] SmartBlog On Social Media added an interesting post today on Blogwell preview: A conversation with Tyson&#226; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SmartBlog On Social Media added an interesting post today on Blogwell preview: A conversation with Tyson&acirc; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posts about social media as of April 22, 2009</title>
		<link>http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/2009/04/22/blogwell-preview-a-conversation-with-tysons-ed-nicholson/comment-page-1/#comment-5861</link>
		<dc:creator>Posts about social media as of April 22, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/?p=2761#comment-5861</guid>
		<description>[...] and as Director of Social Media at BrandoSocial.com in London. I’m also the author   Blogwell preview: A conversation with Tyson’s Ed Nicholson - smartblogs.com 04/22/2009 Some of the biggest names in global business will gather next week at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and as Director of Social Media at BrandoSocial.com in London. I’m also the author   Blogwell preview: A conversation with Tyson’s Ed Nicholson &#8211; smartblogs.com 04/22/2009 Some of the biggest names in global business will gather next week at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

