This post was written by Mirna Bard, a blogger, speaker and consult. She serves as the social-media chairwoman of the Orange County chapter of the National Association of Women Business Owners, and she teaches social media at the University of California at Irvine.

SmartPulse — our weekly reader poll in SmartBrief on Social Media — tracks feedback from leading marketers about social-media practices and issues.

Last week’s poll question: Who handles your company’s social-media efforts?

  • We keep it in-house – 79.19%
  • We use a combination of two or more of the above –  10.41%
  • We use a social-media/interactive agency — 3.62%
  • We use a social-media consultant — 2.71%
  • We use a traditional advertising agency — 2.26%
  • We use a PR firm — 1.81%
  • We use a marketing firm — 0.00%

I was inspired to ask our readers last week’s poll question after Sarah Kessler reached out to me for her post on Mashable, “Social Media Marketing 101: In-House Team, Agency or Consultant?” Kessler accurately points out that there isn’t a single formula when deciding whether to use an in-house team or outsource social-media efforts. I believe the decision to handle social media in-house versus outsourcing depends on many factors, including size of company, objectives and resources, as well as whether a company is using social media for marketing, public relations, customer service, market research, internal communication, etc.

I was not surprised to see that 79.19% said they handle social media in-house, and that only 10.4% said they outsource it to a combination of a social-media/interactive agency, a consultant, traditional advertising agency, or public relations firm. The benefits of using an in-house team are pretty clear. Given that using an authentic voice, executive involvement, leveraging internal collaboration, a strong internal culture and passion for the business are key elements to a successful long-term social-media program, outsourcing social-media execution may not make sense to many companies.

Although it is wise to execute social media using an educated and capable in-house team, a company may have to occasionally bring in an agency, consultant, or public relations firm to handle different situations, such as crisis management, strategy planning, educating the team on new developments, or to simply give a fresh perspective. This may be the reason why 10.41% said they use a combination of two or more of the above suggested responses. We will probably start to see more of a collaborative approach as social media matures and agencies/firms/consultants better define their offerings and articulate them to clients.

What criteria has your company used to decide whether to outsource social media or keep it in-house? Do you think your decision may change as social media develops?

Related Posts

5 Responses to “Is social media better executed in-house?”

  1. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by SmartBrief on SocMed, Mary McKnight, hanssmellinckx, Carol Schiller, Kathy Meyer and others. Kathy Meyer said: Is social media better executed in-house? http://bit.ly/bidACl [...]

  2. Joe Shiller says:

    There are the obvious generic factors to consider, as with outsourcing any work. Some you have already mentioned above. But I think one unique aspect to social media that needs to be considered, is that its social nature likens itself to personal relationship building and that is where it flourishes best. I can easily tell on Facebook which of my friends are genuine and which are manufactured by someone trying to garner traffic to their sites. Granted you could hire a outside person to be friendly and personal, but how many places can you have your heart at the same time. Sooner or later, these people will encounter a conflict of interest.
    My recent post Cartoonage to Tequila Song Music- Funny Dental Animation Art Cartoon Drawing of a Dentist

  3. Mike Handy says:

    It seems a given that community managers in house would not provide reports on their own campaigns. There are 2 core advantages to outsourcing research
    #1 Its 3rd party so the numbers aren't skewed and their activities are defensible
    #2 3rd party research (done by an agency) adds more eyes to the strategy, higher level proficiency and the data tends to be significantly more more robust. Competitors, baseline growth rates, and effectiveness can be viewed with a fresh set of eyes.

    It is IMO the wave of the future is… Community management in house data in an "outhouse" ;) or agency… However early going this partnership will be difficult because agency's are still in the business of taking community management (which is the wrong business).
    My recent post Why

Leave a Reply