Over the years, I’ve read more than a few books, listened to audiotapes and CDs, watched videos and attended conferences where I’ve had the chance to consider viewpoints on what makes leaders excellent in their work. Leader media take up more than a few linear feet of shelving in bookstores and quite a bit of space on the Internet.
Researchers quantify and qualify leaders. Biographers document leaders.
Leaders write and talk about themselves. Search “leaders” and you come up with millions of hits that lead to habits of leaders, characteristics of leaders, skills and competencies of leaders, procedures and processes of leaders, values of leaders and so on.
A lot of media get generated and sold to people looking to understand what makes leaders tick — successfully.
From my own lifelong research, there’s no particular leadership “sauce” or recipe for excellence that appears consistently across leaders. Based on millions of search hits on leaders, one thing is for sure: We have no common performance rubric for leaders that allows us to say: Be this, learn this, do this and you will reach the five.…
Warning: Step away from the search engine!
Google is a great tool, but it’s not perfect for everything.
You can use it to learn the time difference between New York City and Hong Kong, or you can settle an argument with a friend about whether flies really vomit when they land on you. These kinds of questions — ones with a clear-cut, definite answer — are what Google is made for. But if you’re looking for answers to questions that will affect your company or help you make a decision on a professional matter, Google doesn’t quite cut it.
Why Google misses the mark
A Google search is both faster and easier than tracking down an expert to talk to, so why would you go through the trouble of finding a real-life person to answer your questions? Here are three reasons why it’s better to seek an expert’s opinion
You get content that isn’t available online.…
With increasing costs and shrinking resources most, particularly public, universities need to find alternatives to ever-increasing tuition and fees. Basing graduation requirements on total grade points earned is a novel model that could help reduce the time students’ spend obtaining a degree and help focus their studies.
Under this proposed model, an A student would graduate with fewer courses than a C student. While still requiring all courses in the major and general studies, the requirements would permit a students to graduate when they obtained a certain number of grade points.
Using the equivalent of 125 semester credit hours of C as the minimum requirement, a solid B student could graduate with about 100 credit hours, which is more than the total requirements for many majors, including general studies, and can be done in three years. A straight-A student, of which there are very few, might graduate with 85 credit hours.…