<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Punk Rock take on SHRM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smartblogs.com/leadership/2009/03/10/the-punk-rock-take-on-shrm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smartblogs.com/leadership/2009/03/10/the-punk-rock-take-on-shrm/</link>
	<description>SmartBlog on Leadership</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:02:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RMSJr</title>
		<link>http://smartblogs.com/leadership/2009/03/10/the-punk-rock-take-on-shrm/comment-page-1/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>RMSJr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartblogs.com/workforce/?p=530#comment-529</guid>
		<description>While adamantly &amp; absolutely opposed to the EFCA in any form, I have offered a reasonable revision that levels the playing field a bit, (instead of letting it completely topple over on to the 87% of union free American workers). 
 
All card check campaigns must be pre-registered with the NLRB and last for only 30 days after the employer is notified. 
 
Additional improvements include: 
* Card checks must include an automatic expiration date. Who is to say that the cards turned in are all from current employees?  The EFCA revision to the EFCA bypasses the Excelsior list.  
* I have more, but enough said. FMI visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://mainehrcafe.com/2009/02/22/my-efca-response-to-the-portland-press-herald/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://mainehrcafe.com/2009/02/22/my-efca-respons...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
Beyond this one doom &amp; gloom interest, I too remain committed to advancing our profession beyond, well beyond, the administriva. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While adamantly &amp; absolutely opposed to the EFCA in any form, I have offered a reasonable revision that levels the playing field a bit, (instead of letting it completely topple over on to the 87% of union free American workers). </p>
<p>All card check campaigns must be pre-registered with the NLRB and last for only 30 days after the employer is notified. </p>
<p>Additional improvements include:<br />
* Card checks must include an automatic expiration date. Who is to say that the cards turned in are all from current employees?  The EFCA revision to the EFCA bypasses the Excelsior list.<br />
* I have more, but enough said. FMI visit <a href="http://mainehrcafe.com/2009/02/22/my-efca-response-to-the-portland-press-herald/" rel="nofollow">http://mainehrcafe.com/2009/02/22/my-efca-respons&#8230;</a> </p>
<p>Beyond this one doom &amp; gloom interest, I too remain committed to advancing our profession beyond, well beyond, the administriva.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karen m</title>
		<link>http://smartblogs.com/leadership/2009/03/10/the-punk-rock-take-on-shrm/comment-page-1/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>karen m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartblogs.com/workforce/?p=530#comment-528</guid>
		<description>Great Post, Great comments, and nothing much left to be said! 
 
EFCA obviously will not pass as it is, but it is definitely needed. For there to be such a vehement and massive boycott, it only leaves rise to reason the Actual Need for protection for the American Employee..  
 
Today, as the EFCA is written the balance may be too much for the employee/union and of course government.. so, yeah, it obviously still needs a bit of adjustment!  
 
It is time that we bring back fairness to the worker and of course to help bring back the purchasing power to the economy 
 
My only question, when did it become a privilege to work for a company instead of the company being privileged to having the employee help them grow? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post, Great comments, and nothing much left to be said! </p>
<p>EFCA obviously will not pass as it is, but it is definitely needed. For there to be such a vehement and massive boycott, it only leaves rise to reason the Actual Need for protection for the American Employee..  </p>
<p>Today, as the EFCA is written the balance may be too much for the employee/union and of course government.. so, yeah, it obviously still needs a bit of adjustment!  </p>
<p>It is time that we bring back fairness to the worker and of course to help bring back the purchasing power to the economy </p>
<p>My only question, when did it become a privilege to work for a company instead of the company being privileged to having the employee help them grow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

